RFQ Summary
Type
Tender
Priority
P1
Engineer
Ahmed K.
Currency
AED
Typology
Commercial
Received
Feb 10, 2026
Deliverables in Scope
LOD 400
LOD 500
QTO
BEP
COBie
4D
5D
GIS
BOQ
On-site Modeler
On-site BIM Mgmt
Off-site BIM Mgmt
Revision
Rev
1
Timeline
Assigned
Feb 12
SLA Due
Feb 20
Estimation Summary
Total Sheets
42
Total Manhours
620
Man-months
3.52
Estimated Value
AED 38.5K
Package Breakdown
| Level / Deliverable | Sheets | Complexity | Size | Modeler Hrs | Modeler M-M | Modeler MM Val | Modeler Price | Coord Hrs | Coord M-M | Coord Price | Total M-M | Total Price | Sheets/M-M | Avg Hrs/Sheet | Avg Price/Sheet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grand Total | 42 | 620 | 3.52 | AED 2,500 | AED 38,500 | 155 | 0.88 | AED 9,610 | 4.40 | AED 48,110 | 9.55 | 14.76 | AED 1,145 | ||
| ▼ LOD 400 | 42 | 620 | 3.52 | AED 2,500 | AED 38,500 | 155 | 0.88 | AED 9,610 | 4.40 | AED 48,110 | 9.55 | 14.76 | AED 1,145 | ||
| ▸ Tower A — Architectural | 12 | Mixed | A1 | 180 | 1.02 | AED 2,500 | AED 11,220 | 45 | 0.26 | AED 2,805 | 1.28 | AED 14,025 | 9.38 | 15.00 | AED 1,169 |
| ▸ Tower A — Structural | 8 | Level 2 | A1 | 140 | 0.80 | AED 2,500 | AED 8,680 | 35 | 0.20 | AED 2,170 | 1.00 | AED 10,850 | 8.00 | 17.50 | AED 1,356 |
| ▸ Tower A — MEP | 14 | Level 2 | A0 | 200 | 1.14 | AED 2,500 | AED 12,400 | 50 | 0.28 | AED 3,100 | 1.42 | AED 15,500 | 9.86 | 14.29 | AED 1,107 |
| ▸ Common Areas — Structural | 4 | Level 1 | A1 | 50 | 0.28 | AED 2,500 | AED 3,100 | 12 | 0.07 | AED 744 | 0.35 | AED 3,844 | 11.43 | 12.50 | AED 961 |
| ▸ Common Areas — Landscape | 4 | Level 1 | A1 | 50 | 0.28 | AED 2,500 | AED 3,100 | 13 | 0.07 | AED 791 | 0.35 | AED 3,891 | 11.43 | 12.50 | AED 973 |
Estimation Parameters
Modeler MM Value
AED 2,500
Coord MM Value
AED 3,200
Rate/Hour
AED 113.64
Coordination %
25%
Days/Man-month
22
Assumptions & Notes
Estimation Assumptions
• All LOD 400 deliverables as per scope document
• Client to provide architectural reference drawings
• Standard MEP coordination methodology applied
• Timeline assumes continuous availability of team
• No design changes post-handover included
Decision